How can one determine what the language of
the present is? In order to know what exactly is the language of the present,
isn’t only necessary to look at the language of the past? Let’s face it, no one
talks like Shakespeare today. But is this a good or bad thing? Have we
downgraded? I feel as though a major cause of the shift in our use of language
today was the Internet. Is the internet then the root of our degradation of
language?
There
was a point starting in the late 90s when the internet was gaining popularity
that it was the trend to shorten and abbreviate everything. Internet slang was
developed to ease communication, but has it really? I guess it was faster to
type ’ ur’ rather than ‘your.’ But with the fastness and easiness of this new
slang comes consequences. These consequences are the loss of grammatical rule. Although
it is still the trend to shorten words, I think people are beginning to revive
the grammar part of language again. I feel like abbreviations and shortened
words are less seen than when the Internet first began. I will openly admit
that I still use ‘lol’ on a daily basis even when I am not even physically
laughing. Some of this Internet slang that is now inherited in the generations
around it may never go away.
I am speaking about language in relationship
with the internet because that is where I believe language is the most dominant
these days and there is many areas of the internet where this is proven. Just
look at the hashtag phenomenon. People hashtag complete phrases today. The hash symbol was often
used in information technology to highlight a special meaning. Look how the
symbol has evolved. Completely going against what the hash was
originally used for, people now hashtag anything and everything. How can this
function in the organization system that hashtags were intended for? Is there a
limit to how much we can hashtag? Will this system of organization end in a
complete chasm in internet databases?
I believe language is more cultural today
than at any other periods throughout history. In order to truly understand the
language of a specific culture, one must adopt or be conscious of their
cultural surroundings. If you do not keep up with viral videos, memes, images,
news, etc. surrounding social media than you my not understand what people are
talking about. These forces of social media are what give cultural events
importance. Social media is really what drives present day language.
Great intro!
ReplyDeleteYour argument that the language of the internet has developed from slang to a full-fledged language is a great insight. And also insightful is the point you develop in the last paragraph about the conditions of such a language — that its social and cultural context is what gives it its sense, and so without the context, one can't understand it. This is probably true of language generally, but this creates special problems for the reception of contemporary digital or "socially-mediated" language. A particular utopian dream of XX century modernism was of a universal language accessible to everyone, one which dissolved cultural boundaries. Is the new language you're concerned with going in the other direction? Or do the standards and protocols of the web take us toward standardization and universality? Maybe both directions at once are evident.
(The future of hash tags and domain urls is a really interesting subject — there are only so many combinations of words (that make sense) that are available for these. We are already confronting the problems that must result from this linguistic scarcity ....)